KALAMAZOO COUNTY FARM BUREAU
PROPOSED POLICY RESOLUTIONS FOR 2010

LOCAL ISSUES

L 1 TITLE: County Road Commissions

BACKGROUND: Kalamazoo County Road Commission (KCRC) supervises 1260 miles of roads. In 2008 68 miles were seal coated or chip coated and 4 miles were re-graveled. Of the over 1200 miles of roads in our county 101 miles are gravel roads. There are several issues related to the county road commission that we would like to see addressed: first, more money allocated to certain functions and second, enforcement of mailbox and paper box rules.

RESOLUTION: Be it resolved that Kalamazoo County Farm Bureau (KCFB) feels that more money needs to be budgeted for the following areas:
Removal of dead, dying or diseased trees in the road right of way.
Maintaining gravel roads with proper crown in the center and drainage to the ditch.
Improve gravel roads and sealcoat or pave more miles of roads per year - the roads that are done are done very well.
In addition to increased funding we ask the KCRC to be aware and enforce the following:
Because agriculture uses the roadway to move large equipment we have noticed that many mail and paper boxes are too close to the road or are poorly placed, we would ask the road commission to review their policy and enforce it in areas where homeowners may be out of compliance.

MOTION BY   Kelly Leach                    SECONDED BY__Belden Smith____
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X______________AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

L 2 TITLE: Downtown Kalamazoo Arena

BACKGROUND: There has been a lot of talk about building a sports and events venue in downtown Kalamazoo. The details of the plan are:
Where: 9-acre site bounded by Westnedge Avenue, Kalamazoo Avenue, Rose Street and Michigan Avenue.
Who: Kalamazoo County would be the lead government partner and an authority could be created to manage an arena. Other key players could be Western Michigan University and the Kalamazoo Wings, as potential venue users, and the WMU Foundation, which currently owns a large share of the proposed 9-acre site.
What: The land was originally projected as a townhouse-retail center years ago. It could be developed as an "in-town neighborhood" if a 7,000- to 8,000-seat arena proposal falls through. The arena could be financed through hotel, rental car and restaurant surcharges, according to a feasibility study. Project financing would require voter approval.
Why: A feasibility study suggests an arena -- a venue for athletic events, concerts and shows -- would be the centerpiece of a downtown entertainment enclave. The area should also include retail, entertainment, housing and office development, according to the study.
When: Kalamazoo County commissioners are scheduled to begin public discussion of an arena development and financing plan. That could lead to a November ballot question asking county voters to approve the hospitality surcharges.

RESOLUTION: We oppose the idea of tax payers footing the bill for this project. If the market can support the Arena then it should be built, maintained and owned by private industry rather than by the tax-payers of Kalamazoo County.

MOTION BY _Kelly Leach            SECONDED BY_ Harlow Bailey_____
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____________________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

Motion to table the resolution until the 2010 Kalamazoo County Annual PD Meeting.

MOTION BY _Karl Guenther                 SECONDED BY_ Kurt Wiley___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED________X__ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

KALAMAZOO COUNTY FARM BUREAU
PROPOSED POLICY RESOLUTIONS FOR 2010

STATE ISSUES

S 1 TITLE: Pivot Wire Theft

BACKGROUND: In the past couple of years there has been a significant increase in the number of pivot wire thefts. Average cost of an insurance claim, according to MFB Insurance, is around $4000. Direct cost to farmers is their deductible and there is potential of crop loss, especially when repair parts and service are delayed.

Currently it is hard to catch the perpetrators, prove the wire is stolen and get them prosecuted. These thefts are not a high priority to law enforcement. A group of area farmers did meet with the sheriffs department, the meeting did have a positive outcome in making the thefts known, prompting an investigation by the sheriffs department. Current Michigan law doesn't give law enforcement the tools to deter these crimes. Recyclers are not required to ID and track sellers of materials to be recycled. Farmers are not the only target for thieves; there are many other industries that are being similarly impacted. Currently if a recycler purchases stolen material and reports it as stolen, the material is then seized and the recycler is not reimbursed for the price that was paid for the material.

RESOLUTION: Michigan needs to take a tougher stance on these crimes, starting with stiff jail time for the thief and criminal prosecution of recyclers who knowingly purchase stolen wire. Sentencing requirements need to include jail time, fines and restitution of the farmer's deductible and out of pocket costs. Requiring recyclers to ID, fingerprint and track sellers of materials for recycling makes it harder for thieves to profit from their activities.

We further encourage agriculture equipment suppliers to find a way to identify the wiring harness, for example, stamping the harness, to make pivot wire more easily recognizable and less attractive to thieves.
.

MOTION BY    Kelly Leach                      SECONDED __Norm French _
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X____ __________ AS AMENDED__________________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 2 TITLE: Education for Associate Members

BACKGROUND: As time has gone by, families are getting farther from the farm and need more education about agriculture. The "green" competition seems to be getting stronger.

We feel any way to educate non farm public is important. We have associate members who receive a quarterly newsletter called the Benefits Advisor, which contains information about their benefits and basic agriculture education. We appreciate the changes we have seen. As always agriculture and Farm Bureau members need to increase our message and the avenues available to educate the non farm public.

RESOLUTION: We recommend that our associate members be educated by putting more articles about agriculture in the Benefits Advisor that is sent to them. Use Email and website postings to get out the positive message about Michigan agriculture. Encourage county Farm Bureaus to be more active with their websites to continue to spread information about agriculture. Michigan Farm Bureau has a wonderful resource in our P&E Department. Materials to counties should be a regularly available and updated to help them present a polished, professional and accurate image of agriculture. Ensuring counties have access to a convenient method to update their websites. In order to fund such a program we support the establishment of a voluntary dues assessment/add on with the money being utilized for agriculture promotion, education and public relations.

MOTION BY    Kelly Leach                 SECONDED _Ron Hayward__ _
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X_____ __________ AS AMENDED__________________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 3 TITLE: #62 Elections

RESOLUTION: We believe Michigan Farm Bureau should encourage all members to register to vote. We also believe MFB should expand efforts to provide education and information on elections and supply candidate information to local newspapers.

Campaign reform is overdue and should be established at all levels of government to address all elements of campaigning. We recommend:

- Election projections on Election Day not be released to the public until all polls are closed in the continental United States.

- Clear, concise and simple language be used on all ballot issues.

- All ballots be printed in English only.

- The Michigan Constitution be amended to increase the percentage of voter signatures required to initiate a recall election to 35 20 percent.

- Recall petitions must contain proven factual basis for the recall before the petition is approved. Anyone petitioning for a recall for other than malfeasance in office be required to post a bond covering the cost of the special recall election. If the recall is successful, the money will be returned to the petitioner. Otherwise, the frivolous recall election will be paid for without cost to the government body.

- Changing the length of term for county commissioners to four years with staggered terms of office.

Term limits have been successful in cycling new people into public service as State legislators. However, we feel the frantic pace at which this turnover occurs is too rapid for these people to amass the required experience to become the leaders we need. Therefore, we recommend extending the number of terms for State Representatives up to 6 two-year terms and State Senators up to 3 four-year terms. As the Legislature is reluctant to approach this subject, we propose that Michigan Farm Bureau investigate working with other organizations to initiate a petition drive to accomplish this. Furthermore, legislative compensation and benefits should be reviewed and reduced. From now forward, politicians would receive health insurance benefits while in office and to be continued one year for each year in office and not for their lifetime.

MFB would consider supporting a part-time Legislature, provided other legislative reforms are implemented to maintain a balance of power between the three branches of government. Such reforms might include timeframes for budget approval, greater legislative oversight of state departments and the rules process, and review of the legislative compensation process.

We recognize on November 2, 2010 there will be an automatic vote for a decision to hold a Constitutional Convention. We urge MFB to oppose a constitutional convention. provide timely and pertinent education to members.

We support the current primary election process.

Special elections accrue high costs for local taxpayers. We support:

- Elected officials not be allowed to pursue a different elected position, unless they are at the end of their current term or resign from their currently held elected position.

- Once a millage for a specified purpose is defeated by voters, it should not be up for another vote for at least one full year.

Milage elections and vote should only take place during the November General Election - ensuring that voter turn out is higher. and doesn't give the milage an unfair advantage.

We oppose:

- Reducing the voter registration deadline to anything less than 30 days before an election.

- Election Day becoming a holiday.

- Early voting except by absentee ballot.


MOTION BY     Kelly Leach                   SECONDED __Phillip Gray _         
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X____ __________ AS AMENDED_____X_ ___________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 4 TITLE: Division in Agriculture/Farmers Unite

RESOLUTION: Michigan is one of the most diverse producers of agriculture commodities in the U. S. which in turn allows producers a unique and varied opportunity of marketing options. Since Michigan farmers are unique growers of both specialty and traditional commodities this uniqueness allows them the special opportunity to provide residents in Michigan and throughout the U.S. diverse food products. In addition this ability to provide so many diverse crops tends to create both positive and negative competition within our own ranks and at times creates negative results regarding "what is the best way to produce our food". The negative results of this competition has allowed outside forces to generate division within our own agriculture arena.

Therefore Michigan agriculture producers who provide a safe and wholesome food product for all consumers should work together to positively promote all segments of our farming community. Regardless of size, type of farming, or commodity produced all farmers should positively and collectively support each other within our agriculture community regardless of differences of producing farm commodities. (If the problem does not affect a farmers operation, some farmers do not see that it is important to them. Take the time to support the other farmer's causes.)

Furthermore if the farming community continues to demonstrate their unwillingness to support all facets of agriculture production the result will only provide organizations like PETA, HSUS, and others the ammunition to undermine our ability to provide a safe and plentiful food supply for the entire world. The undermining of our food system will continue especially if agriculture producers demonstrate their unwillingness to work together.

Therefore be it resolved that, Kalamazoo County Farm Bureau, proposes that Michigan Farm Bureau work on a media campaign to remind farmers that all farmers, regardless of size, shape, or crop/livestock produced, should be collectively working together to demonstrate to all consumers that we support all types of farming, and farming practices regardless of management style or how product is produced if following GAAMPS.


MOTION BY   Kelly Leach                  SECONDED __Karl Guenther _
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X____ __________ AS AMENDED__________________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 5 TITLE: Animal and Environmental Care

RESOLUTION: Farm employees occasionally commit acts of improper treatment towards animals and the environment and do not tell the farm manager or owner. Sometimes these individuals not only work for the farm but also for other organizations collecting evidence of this abuse while keeping it from the farm manager. This has been the case with the farm displayed on HBO's Death on a Factory Farm and the slaughter house incident in California.

Employee Code of Animal and Environmental Care
Farm's Name , has an ethical obligation to provide for the well-being of the environment and its farm animals. The industry has gone to great lengths to establish programs to safeguard the well-being of all livestock while on the farm, during transport, and at processing plants and actively engage in protecting the environment on and off the farm.
Like everyone else, producers, processors and others in agriculture are appalled when we see evidence of animal or environmental abuse. Because these occurrences are not representative of the care our industry takes to protect our environment and animals, they deserve a response by those involved with agriculture. These incidences are inexcusable and must stop.
Farm's Name , is calling on all organizations and persons involved with agriculture to increase our industry's attention to this important issue. Those who detect animal or environmental abuse have an obligation to address it by notifying the farm owner, the transport company's management, the plant's management, or the plant's USDA inspector without delay.
These actions must be taken immediately for the sake of the livestock at the operation and the well being of the surrounding environment. Failure to report animal and environmental abuse immediately in order to advance an agenda that exploits the abuse for personal or organizational gain is unethical and inexcusable. Those who witness abuse have an ethical obligation to report it immediately.
If you or an individual in your organization detects possible animal or environmental abuse, please take one of the following steps:
- If on a farm, bring it to the immediate attention of the farm owner or farm manager on duty.
- If during transport, contact the transportation company immediately
- If at a plant, contact the plant's management or USDA inspector immediately
Once reported, those in positions of responsibility for animal and environmental well being have an obligation to act quickly to end any and all mistreatment and to take corrective action to assure systems are in place that protect animal and environmental well-being.
It is of the utmost importance to those at Farm's Name________________ to provide proper care for the animals and/or environmental at and around the operation. Agriculture is committed to the responsible production of agricultural commodities, meat, milk and eggs and that includes providing for the well being of animals and the environment on the farm, during transport and in the processing plant.
As an employee of Farm's Name , I have read and fully understand the Employee Code of Animal and Environmental Care. I agree that it is my responsibility to immediately report any and all environmental and/or animal abuse to the farm manager, transportation company, and/or USDA inspector immediately. As a condition of employment at Farm Name , I agree to abide by these standards.
Printed Name: .
Employee signature: .
Date: .

MOTION BY    Kelly Leach                 SECONDED __Rob Richardson _
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X_______________ AS AMENDED___X___ ___________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 6 TITLE: Michigan Conservation Districts

RESOLUTION: Conservation Districts were formed by local communities to work within those communities to establish priorities regarding the natural resource and conservation needs in the individual areas. They also have a primary purpose of assisting the United States Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) district conservationists in working with the farmers and landowners within their counties. This cooperative effort brings federal farm bill money earmarked for conservation practices to Michigan producers and landowners. Enhancing farmland conservation practices and natural resource stewardship benefits both farmers and the public.

We strongly support the full restoration of state funding for Conservation Districts from the state's general fund and continue to support efforts to find a dedicated source of funding for the Conservation Districts. This will allow them to plan long-term projects knowing that funding is secure.

Dedicated funds derived from agricultural sources should focus on providing cost-share to producers for implementing conservation practices. We urge Michigan Farm Bureau to work with the Michigan Department of Agriculture (MDA) and the local Conservation Districts to see that all producers in the State have equal access to the producer-funded Groundwater Stewardship Program. The Michigan Legislature should initiate the redirection of Department of Environmental Quality non-regulatory responsibilities and accompanying funding to the MDA for distribution to the Conservation Districts.

We encourage the Conservation Districts to take full advantage of Farm Bill programs, federal watershed initiative programs, and other grant opportunities to provide services and programs for farmers in addition to dedicated funds. Where co-location is possible, the NRCS should continue to allow Conservation Districts to co-locate at no charge. Where NRCS does not have resources available, the Conservation Districts should look to co-locating with other agriculture/conservation related entities. We support efforts to leverage NRCS funding with state and local funding to increase the farm bill money coming to Michigan agricultural producers. We urge Michigan Farm Bureau (MFB) to keep its members informed of the cooperative efforts between NRCS, MDA, and the Conservation Districts and the amount of federal farm bill conservation money coming to the producers and landowners of Michigan from this cooperation.

Conservation Districts regularly apply for grants involving conservation practices. Many of those grants have specific, not customary, plant requirements. Michigan Farm Bureau should work cooperatively with the Commodity Executive Directors of Michigan and the Michigan Association of Conservation Districts to find Michigan private industry suppliers for the plant material needed by the Conservation Districts to fulfill grant requirements that they may encounter. We encourage the Conservation Districts to offer only non-invasive species for conservation purposes.

Under PA 451 of 1994 as amended, Conservation Districts are allowed to propagate, grow and sell plants that are beneficial for conservation practices and have been designated as "conservation species" by the Conservation Species Advisory Panel. The legislative intent of PA 451 was to limit the negative impact on the private nursery and greenhouse industry from plant production by state-subsidized, tax-exempt Conservation Districts. This "conservation species" list is reviewed annually. We are concerned about the number of recent additions to the approved propagation list. Conservation Districts should be encouraged to purchase their plant materials from Michigan private industry suppliers whenever possible. (The current production acres of the nursery run by Newaygo CD will be excluded from this directive.) The affected Commodity Executive Director should assist in finding an appropriate number of suppliers within their membership to provide the volume of plant material needed by the Conservation Districts. We encourage MFB to take an active role in encouraging this cooperation.

We encourage Farm Bureau members to support and become actively involved with local Conservation Districts. We encourage MFB to educate members about agricultural stewardship and support efforts to make the public aware of the benefits of an investment in good stewardship. We urge all farmers to utilize Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices to protect soil, water and other resources.

We support proactive watershed management at the local level with the Conservation Districts as the primary agency to initiate watershed management programming and technical assistance. We encourage Conservation Districts to review current funding mechanisms and assess the benefits of changing to a watershed based structure.

MOTION BY    Kelly Leach              SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther_____ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X___ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

S 7 TITLE: Michigan Merit Curriculum Policy

BACKGROUND: The Michigan Merit Curriculum (MMC) is a state law that dictates what credits are required in order to graduate from High School. Students now need the following credits: 4 math, 4 English language arts, 3 science, 3 social studies, 1 physical education, 1 visual performing or applied arts, and 2 foreign language for a total of 18 credits. These credits are required and the students will be tested on them via the Michigan Merit Exam (MME) which is given in the 11th grade.
Local school districts have the flexibility to determine which classes meet the curriculum requirements. Some school districts have added additional classes to the graduation requirement to ensure that their students are prepared for the MME. While some school districts have approved agri-science classes for science credit, there are many that have not. This further hinders a student's ability to choose elective classes, like vocational and technical education classes.
Concern: This new curriculum is making it more difficult for students to fit career and technical education coursework into their schedule (especially if the student is in band or chorus, which already accounts for 4 credits they will take). The agriculture industry relies on vocational training programs like agri-science, metals shop, etc. Not all students are college bound. We will always need plumbers, welders, builders and auto technicians. The new MMC requirements unfairly force students that could otherwise thrive in vocational programs into college prep classes.
Potential solutions:
Reduce the foreign language requirements to 1 credit.
Encourage schools to strongly recommend algebra II and chemistry, but don't make them required for a diploma.

These changes, along with other changes are needed for vocational classes to survive in Michigan high schools. With less flexibility in selecting classes, students are not able to enroll in vocational classes. With less numbers in each class coupled with the current budget situation, schools will have to start cutting vocational classes.

RESOLUTION: Michigan Farm Bureau shall work with legislators to amend the MMC to provide more opportunities for students to enroll in vocational training programs.

MOTION BY _Kelly Leach         SECONDED BY_ _Phillip Gray_____ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED____X_____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

KALAMAZOO COUNTY FARM BUREAU
PROPOSED POLICY RESOLUTIONS FOR 2010

NATIONAL ISSUES

N 1 TITLE: Animal Welfare and Farmers Care Campaign

BACKGROUND: Today the vegetarian, animal rights, and environmental groups attack modern animal agriculture through the veil of animal welfare. These groups through using ballot initiatives and legislation make it so difficult for farmers that there will no longer be animal agriculture in the U.S.

RESOLUTION: We need to educate the public on the real driving force behind these animal rights initiatives. The Farmers Care program and legislation will help provide some of the needed protection for animal agriculture.

We recommend that Farm Bureau spearhead a consortium of all players in the food production chain (livestock, poultry, and dairy) including consumers. This group will develop a marketing and public relations campaign to educate consumers in the value of American products and what will happen when they lose their choice when "the Humane Society of the US" legislates the American farmer out of business and they have a choice of vegetarian or foreign products. There also needs to be a concerted effort to work with food marketing groups, commodity groups and grocery stores to have a comprehensive plan to address more than the animal rights aspect. These other groups also have a stake in the continuation of a safe food supply for American consumers.


MOTION BY _Kelly Leach               SECONDED __Norm French _
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED______X____ __________ AS AMENDED__________________ DEFEATED_____________________

KALAMAZOO COUNTY FARM BUREAU
PROPOSED POLICY REAFFIRMATIONS FOR 2010

LOCAL ISSUES

R-L 1 TITLE: Slow Moving Vehicle Signs

BACKGROUND: Many of us have noticed that in the last few years the use of SMV signs has been for things other than they are intended. People are using them on mailboxes, driveways and other non-conforming uses. We would like to see this end.

REAFFIRMATION: We would like to develop an informational campaign for local stores that would educate buyers of SMV signs, on the law and the way SMV signs are supposed to be used. We would like this to be a priority for our county, not only to educate the consumer but also the retailers.

MOTION BY     KellyLeach_               SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-L 2 TITLE: County Road Commissions

BACKGROUND: Recently there has been an issue in Climax Township between the Kalamazoo County Road Commission and several landowners involving a road project. The proposed project greatly impacts a parcel of land that has enrolled in the Purchase of development Rights program with the state of Michigan. There is a proposed plan to straighten out some curves and rework an intersection of 44th street. There were several plans developed and meetings held for public input, it was made very clear that several of the routes would involve PDR land. The Road Commission then chose one of the plans that went through the middle of the PDR ground. The state of Michigan and MDA has helped fight the road commission to stop this plan from moving forward.

REAFFIRMATION: Be it resolved that any County Road Commission projects that impact PDR ground and that have other options for a route should not be allowed to proceed through preserved farmland. There should also be consideration given to businesses and their loss of income due to road commission projects.

MOTION BY    KellyLeach_            SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

STATE ISSUES

R-S 1 TITLE: Feral Swine Control and private game preserves

BACKGROUND: The feral swine population is increasing. Not only do feral swine create damage to the environment but they also can carry diseases that can contaminate domesticated swine herds. There has been confirmed Psuedorabies found in a private hunting preserve in Michigan. There has been an extensive effort on the part of Michigan's swine producers to eradicate this disease; it is disturbing to find that private game preserves could derail the work that has been done.

At the present time, feral swine hunting is being challenged. We need a dedicated eradication option. Not having one leaves too much time for them to do damage and reproduce. The chance that they could also contaminate domesticated herds is too great a risk.

REAFFIRMATION: Therefore, we believe that landowners should be able to control feral hogs that are destroying their property or are in close proximity to domesticated swine with no need to have a permit or license. We also believe there should be a yearlong, open hunting season for feral swine.

In addition any private game preserves should have to test and depopulate if any disease is found in order to protect the swine industry in Michigan.

MOTION BY         KellyLeach_           SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 2 TITLE: Sand Hill Crane Hunting Season

BACKGROUND: Sand Hill cranes cause considerable economic loss to Michigan agriculture through excessive crop loss. The There is a process that farmers need to go through to get a permit to hunt sand hill cranes but it is very hard to get, making it cumbersome and less than timely. Other states have a season for these migratory birds. Texas has a defined and lengthy season for the hunting of Sand Hill cranes.

REAFFIRMATION: We ask that the state of Michigan set up a dedicated hunting season for Sand Hill cranes, taking into account the migration habits and timing to ensure a fruitful season. We would expect that permit fees would be in line with other migratory bird hunting seasons.

MOTION BY    KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 3 TITLE: Gubernatorial Appointments

REAFFIRMATION: Whereas the commission system that governs certain state departments has benefited the State of Michigan through improved continuity and reduced the politicization of these resource-oriented Departments,

Therefore be it resolved that Michigan Farm Bureau vigorously support the commission system that currently governs the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Natural Resources, and the Department of Education.

Be it further resolved that the Department of Environmental Quality also be placed under the commission system.

MOTION BY    KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 4 TITLE: Local Elections

REAFFIRMATION: Cities utilize nonpartisan elections to not only save money but to allow all people to vote for whom they feel is the best candidate.

We support allowing townships and villages to hold nonpartisan elections for local offices.

MOTION BY          KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 5 TITLE: Land Acquisitions for Public Projects

REAFFIRMATION: The condemnation of property by eminent domain should be permitted only when there is a clear need for the betterment of transportation, public utility and national defense.

We oppose the taking of property by government for the purpose of development of privately-owned nonpublic projects.

We support a complete agricultural impact statement before productive agricultural land is condemned. The statement should evaluate all direct and indirect physical and economic impacts to agriculture. We support the concept of no-net gain for state and federal ownership of land in Michigan.

In such cases where all condemned land is not needed at the completion of a public project, the original landowner should have the right of first refusal at the price paid by the government entity.

MOTION BY     KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 6 TITLE: Cottage Food Operations

BACKGROUND: Much attention is being given to local and locally grown foods; in fact it is a trend gaining a considerable following. In response to this trend, and with the increased efforts to establish and grow thriving Farmers Markets in Michigan, as demonstrated by the formation of the Michigan Farmers Market Association, legislation such as H.B. 4568 would be beneficial to those efforts.

Current food law prevents anyone without access to a certified kitchen from preparing any food products for sale, or even sample, at Farmers Markets. Allowing vendors to sample their products, fresh melons or tomatoes for example, would increase sales at markets. Being able to prepare a baked good with a fruit product and offering samples is another scenario.

Many farmers markets are finding it difficult to find adequate numbers of vendors. Some markets survive it and others do not. Small markets need to have an adequate variety of product to keep customers coming back. In addition, offerings of fresh produce can be slim in early and late seasons at markets of every size. Many vendors of fresh fruits and vegetables would appreciate being able to sell value added products from their fruits and vegetables on a small scale, supplementing their seasonal offerings with safe prepared or preserved food products. Current food laws make it impossible to do so in any cost effective way. While a few communities do have certified kitchens available for rental, many do not and liability issues do not encourage churches and community facilities to make their kitchens available.

"Cottage Food Operation" means a person who produces or packages non-potentially hazardous food in a kitchen of that person's primary domestic residence."

"Non-potentially hazardous food" means that term as defined in the food code, which includes, but is not limited to, baked goods, jams, jellies, candy, snack food, cereal, granola, dry mixes, vinegar, and dried herbs. Non-potentially hazardous food does not include home-canned low-acid or acidified vegetables, home-canned salsa, or home-canned food; food service items; ready-to-eat meals, meat, sandwiches, cheese, or custard pies; garlic in oil; food that requires temperature control for safety; and bottled water, home-produced ice products, and other beverages and products.

In this bill, "(1) A cottage food operation is exempt from the licensing and inspection provisions of this act. This exemption does not include an exemption from the labeling, adulteration, and other standards imposed in this section or under this act, or both. (2) In addition to the other labeling and disclosure requirements imposed by this act, a cottage food operation shall place on the label of any food it produces or packages a statement that substantially complies with the following: "Made in a home kitchen that has not been inspected by the Michigan Department of Agriculture." (3) The permissible sale location of non-potentially hazardous food by a cottage food operation is limited to homes, farm markets, or roadside stands; municipal farmers markets; county fairs; and town celebrations, festivals, and events. A cottage food operation claiming an exemption from licensure under this section is not allowed to sell non-potentially hazardous food at craft shows, flea markets, or other for-profit events; by means of the internet or other media inside or outside this state; at permanent sales venues other than farmers markets, homes, or roadside stands; or by means of consignment or in other licensed retail establishments. (4) The gross sales of non-potentially hazardous food shall not exceed $15,000.00 annually. The department may request in writing documentation to verify the gross sales figure. (5) An exemption under this section does not affect the application of any other state or federal laws or any applicable ordinances enacted by any local unit of government."

This legislation, or that of a similar nature, would sufficiently protect consumers and at the same time create opportunities for Michigan residents to start new, small enterprises and/or increase sales for existing operations.

REAFFIRMATION: We are supportive of legislation that would help farmers markets in Michigan grow and thrive. Leaving a positive impact on communities and producers of Michigan fruits and vegetables. This legislation in no way places Michigan consumers at risk and still addresses food safety requirements adequately.

MOTION BY    KellyLeach_              SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-S 7 TITLE: Land Use/Sprawl

BACKGROUND: In the State of Michigan, there are several policies that contribute to poor land use decisions and urban sprawl. One is the state shared revenue formula with local units of government, which is based solely on population. The more houses and people the more money from the State. Another is the subsidizing of development of new infrastructure by local government for those locations away from existing infrastructure.

REAFFIRMATION: We propose that the State shared revenue formula be changed to reflect the following: 50% of shared revenue would be population based, 50% would be based on the local unit of governments effectiveness of farmland preservation and urban redevelopment. This portion would be based on criteria developed by the Michigan Agriculture Preservation Board.

Also before a local unit of government approves a new development where municipal services are needed the group (developers) must pay for the needed infrastructure for these municipal services.

MOTION BY    KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________DEFEATED_____________________

NATIONAL ISSUES

R-N 1 TITLE: National Energy Policy - A 10 Year Plan

BACKGROUND: It took the USA 3 years and 8 months to win WW II. The entire country was behind the effort and everyone helped out in one way or another. There is no reason we couldn't do it again in relation to the nation's energy needs and our dependency on foreign oil. There are so many resources that we have at our disposal that are ignored or greatly under utilized. We need to improve our energy infrastructure and put some "energy" into solving our energy problems.

REAFFIRMATION: Our elected officials have failed us by not developing a comprehensive national energy policy; the following are things we feel are needed in addition to renewable energy sources:
Build 25 oil refineries in 10 years. They could be built on closed or under used military bases around the US. They should be built within close proximity to existing pipelines or ports where crude oil is accessible. They would be part of a public/private ownership package to be described further.
Build 100 Nuclear power plants in the next 10 years. They would have common design, one that the scientific community would come up with to be safe, efficient and the overall best option. Each state would get 2 of the plants so that every US Senator would have 2 in their state. This would treat every area equally and fairly. It is way past time to solve the nuclear waste issue. Other countries have done this and have been successful. We should utilize their work into our plan. These Power plants would also be part of a public/ private partnership.
What is a public/Private Partnership? The Public (Federal Government) portion of this partnership starts the project. They get the ball rolling by determining location, land acquisitions, permits, and favorable legislation to move things along quickly. Then turn the plants over to the private sector to be run. This arrangement may help eliminate nuisance lawsuits from the environmental community to prevent the implementation of these programs.

MOTION BY          KellyLeach_          SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________

R-N 2 TITLE: Eminent Domain

REAFFIRMATION: The taking of property or easements should be permitted only when there is a clear-cut need for the betterment of the public good and the completion of the project is guaranteed. We oppose the use of eminent domain for recreational purposes, private economic development, or to expand the landholdings of wildlife agencies. In cases where private property is taken, we support prompt, just and adequate compensation. In cases of partial takings of real property, loss in the value of any remaining real property should be recognized, and compensation paid for any damages which result.

All utility lines, cables and pipelines should be properly installed according to appropriate specifications. Such installations should be adequately marked. A landowner or tenant shall not be held liable for any accidental or inadvertent breakage or disruption of service on any lines, cables or pipelines.

We believe a landowner in eminent domain cases should have five years from the time of the original settlement in which to negotiate claims for damages that may not have been confirmed at the time of initial settlement.

We will seek legislation to require public bodies proposing acquisition of property for public purposes to send a written notice at least 60 days prior to any formal public hearing and to hold such hearing before any land is optioned or purchased. Local communities and states should be required to be given prior knowledge of a pending utility permit before a proposed utility right of way is granted by the federal government. Property owners should have the right to judicial review of the need and location of the proposed taking.

We oppose legislation, which grants the right of federal eminent domain to any additional entities. We oppose the ability of non-elected boards, agencies and commissions, public or private, to utilize the eminent domain process.

Property should not be condemned in fee title if a lesser interest will suffice.

We oppose the use of eminent domain to acquire properties intended for future sale. Any lands taken for public purposes and not promptly used for that purpose (i.e., within a maximum period of five years) must be offered immediately to the prior owners or their heirs at a price no higher than the original purchase price. We believe that entities having the owner of eminent domain when acquiring land for right of way, either by condemnation, threat of condemnation, or easement should be required to maintain natural drainage and should be held liable for damage to landowners.

An environmental impact statement should be prepared as a prerequisite for any eminent domain proceeding.

We oppose the practice of acquiring new rights of way through farmland when existing public corridors exist, such as railways, highways, power lines, pipelines, etc. In numerous situations, especially when non-threatening entities such as, but not limited to, fiber optic cables are run, legislation should require using these existing corridors so additional farmland is not hindered by restrictive easement.

We support changes in legislation regarding eminent domain cases that would strengthen the rights of landowners and would allow them greater latitude to present evidence in court proceedings.

MOTION BY      KellyLeach_           SECONDED BY_ Karl Guenther___ __
MEMBER ACTION: ADOPTED_____X____ ___________ AS AMENDED___________________ DEFEATED_____________________