Farm capital expenditures turn higher | Michigan Farm News

Farm capital expenditures turn higher

Category: Crops

by David Widmar, Agricultural Economic Insights

farmnews_capital_091118
After falling 36 percent in 2016, USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) shows farms increased capital expenditures in 2017 by 16 percent, with expenditures of $35 billion.

When times are tough in agriculture, efforts to lower costs and improve cash flow often necessitate a cut, or delay, in capital expenditures. As expected, farm capital expenditures, after peaking in 2014, rapidly contracted as net farm income and commodity prices turned sharply lower. In this week’s post, we’ll review recently released data that reveals farm capital expenditure reversed course in 2017 and recently turned higher.

Figure 1 shows inflation-adjusted farm capital expenditures since 1960. These data exclude operator dwellings. As one might expect, farm capital expenditures peak during the farm economy booms and retreat during financial slow-downs. Since 1960, there were two up-turns; the late 1970s and from 2012 to 2014. During the earlier boom, farm capital expenditures peaked at $57 billion in 1979.

Recently, expenditures peaked at a modest $47.7 billion in 2014. By 2016, however, farm capital expenditures fell 36 percent to $30 billion. While $30 billion represented a sharp decline, it remained above levels observed throughout most of the 1990s and early 2000s.

The latest data from the USDA’s Economic Research Service (ERS) shows farms increased capital expenditures in 2017 by 16 percent, with expenditures of $35 billion. It’s worth noting the USDA current estimate for 2018 is a very preliminary estimate. A sound figure for 2018 activity won’t come until August 2019.

farmnews_capitalchart1

Figure 1. Real (2018 USD) Total Farm Capital Expenditures (excludes operator dwellings), 1960 to 2018f. Data Source: USDA ERS.

Two of the largest categories of farm capital expenditures are tractors and machinery. In 2017, these two categories ($9 billion for machinery and $7 billion for tractors) accounted for 53 percent of the total.

Figure 2 shows how investments in these two categories have changed over time. Specifically, the data are indexed to the average from 2000 to 2002. This provides a measure for comparing how relative spending changed during the farm economy boom and slow down.

While both categories follow a similar trend, tractors have seen more relative change. During the boom, tractor expenditures reached an index value of nearly 250, or 150 percent increase over the base period values. Another way of thinking about this, each $1,000 in capital expenditures during the base period was equal to $2,500 during the peak.

Farm machinery, however, didn’t peak nearly as high. As tractors reached an index value of 250, machinery peaked at 200.

During the slowdown, both have trended lower. In both cases, current index values remain above 100. This tells us current capital expenditures remain above the base period, in inflation-adjusted terms. Broadly speaking, however, tractors are relatively stronger in 2017 (index value of 179) than machinery (index value of 124).

farmnews_capitalchart_091118

Figure 2. Index of Select Farm Capital Expenditures (100 = 2000-2002). Tractors and Machinery, 2000 to 2017.

Relative to Income

A final way of considering capital expenditure data is relative to the value of farm production. The first thing to consider is how different this measure is today compared to earlier years. During the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s, capital expenditures were a much larger share of the value of farm production.

More recently, capital expenditures relative to the value of farm production has average 8.2 percent since 1998. Interestingly, this measure hasn’t varied much over the last 20 years. Specifically, it has ranged from a low of 7.3 percent to a high of 9.5 percent. In 2016, this relationship was 7.3 percent, nearly a record low. In 2017, however, the ratio recovered to 8.3 percent.

Given the narrow window for this measure over time, and the forecast declines in farm income and the value of farm production in 2018, a decline in farm capital expenditures in 2018 seems likely.