Avoid common mistakes with crop insurance

Law of the Land

Brion Doyle | October 17, 2013

Brion Doyle pngWith federal crop insurance now available to Michigan tart cherry growers and with other farmers considering or reconsidering crop insurance following adverse weather conditions in recent years, it is important to understand the different protections that crop insurance can provide and how to maximize those protections in the event of a loss. 

Federal crop insurance has its origins in the Dust Bowl era of the 1930s, when Congress created the taxpayer-subsidized insurance program to protect farmers against crop losses. Today, the USDA's Risk Management Agency (RMA) manages federal crop insurance and contracts with the 19 Approved Insurance Providers (AIPs), the private insurance companies that provide policies to farmers.

The two most recognized types of crop insurance policies available to farmers are crop-hail policies and Multiple Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI). Crop-hail policies are not part of the federal crop insurance program and are provided directly to farmers by private insurers. Crop-hail policies can be purchased at any time during the growing season. MPCI, in contrast, is the crop insurance plan developed and rated by the USDA. MPCI policies offer a yield guarantee based on the Actual Production History (APH) of the individual producer and provide protection from a variety of natural causes, including drought, excessive moisture, freeze, and disease. 

Farmers considering federal crop insurance coverage can also choose among new coverage options that offer a combination of revenue and yield protection, including Crop Revenue Coverage (CRC), Revenue Assurance (RA), Income Protection (IP), at varying levels of coverage for the insured crop. It is also important that farmers do not overlook Catastrophic (CAT) coverage, which, while only offering partial protection against significant crop failure, is essentially free.

Once the appropriate coverage is selected, there are several steps that an insured can take to reduce potential disputes and maximize recovery in the event of a loss. First, farmers must be mindful of several important deadlines, including:

• the deadline for applying for coverage
• the final planting date
• the acreage reporting date, and
• the deadline for filing notice of crop damage. 

In addition, the RMA reports several common mistakes that can lead to a reduction or elimination of coverage, including underreporting or overreporting planted acreage, failing to report all farm serial numbers planted to the insured crop, failing to report the production of all farm serial numbers, failing to elect "new producer" status, harvesting the crop in a manner other than insured (i.e., harvesting corn as silage when it is insured as grain), and destroying insured crop without the insurance company's approval. 

Finally, perhaps the most important step a farmer can take is to organize and keep complete records relating to all insured crops. Farmers have a duty under their federal crop insurance policy to keep records related to the planting, replanting, inputs, harvesting, production, and sale of the insured crop. Well-organized records can be the key to preventing or winning a crop insurance dispute. 

Record droughts in recent years, damaging frosts, and once-in-a-lifetime flooding have all highlighted the need for crop insurance as a risk management tool. At the same time, as crop insurance indemnities set new records in 2011 and 2012, crop insurance disputes also are likely to rise. For this reason, in addition to selecting the most appropriate policy, farmers must be proactive in following the policy requirements and retaining and organizing their records in order to minimize and prevent the delay or denial of coverage. And because the decision regarding what type of crop insurance policy and what level of coverage to purchase can be quite complex, it is important for farmers to consult with their insurance agent to carefully consider coverage needs.

This advisory has been prepared by Varnum LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Leave a comment
Name *
Email *
Homepage
Comment

Index

 Columns Grey

Three questions for markets

Dr. Jim Hilker | February 28, 2015

Jim Hilker png Three questions that need to be asked are, what will the basis do between now and July, what direction will futures take, and how much risk are you willing to take?

Bitter cold weather continued across the Great Lakes

Weather Outlook

Jeff Andresen | February 15, 2015

Jeff Andresen pngBitter cold weather continued across the Great Lakes region during the first half of February in response to the continued presence of a deep upper-air trough over eastern North America.

Manure rulings stink for farmers

Law of the Land

Varnum LLP | February 15, 2015 

Matt EugsterHistorically, the agricultural industry has not been the focus of stringent enforcement by environmental agencies. Presumably, regulators did not subject the agricultural community to the same level of scrutiny as industrial facilities because farms and food processing facilities do not typically use industrial chemicals.

2015 annual livestock outlook

Market Outlook

Dr. Jim Hilker | February 4, 2015

Jim Hilker png Cattle, calf prices up, hog production could be up 3.7 percent

2015 annual crops outlook

Market Outlook

Dr. Jim Hilker | February 3, 2015

Jim Hilker png The baseline numbers are presented in Table 1. By baseline, I mean, given what I know and expect, we all know a lot can and will happen to change these expectations. How the world debt continues to play out, world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth, oil/gas prices, U.S. and world weather crisis, etc., will all play a role, as, to a large degree, as they are all unknowns.