Avoid common mistakes with crop insurance

Law of the Land

Brion Doyle | October 17, 2013

Brion Doyle pngWith federal crop insurance now available to Michigan tart cherry growers and with other farmers considering or reconsidering crop insurance following adverse weather conditions in recent years, it is important to understand the different protections that crop insurance can provide and how to maximize those protections in the event of a loss. 

Federal crop insurance has its origins in the Dust Bowl era of the 1930s, when Congress created the taxpayer-subsidized insurance program to protect farmers against crop losses. Today, the USDA's Risk Management Agency (RMA) manages federal crop insurance and contracts with the 19 Approved Insurance Providers (AIPs), the private insurance companies that provide policies to farmers.

The two most recognized types of crop insurance policies available to farmers are crop-hail policies and Multiple Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI). Crop-hail policies are not part of the federal crop insurance program and are provided directly to farmers by private insurers. Crop-hail policies can be purchased at any time during the growing season. MPCI, in contrast, is the crop insurance plan developed and rated by the USDA. MPCI policies offer a yield guarantee based on the Actual Production History (APH) of the individual producer and provide protection from a variety of natural causes, including drought, excessive moisture, freeze, and disease. 

Farmers considering federal crop insurance coverage can also choose among new coverage options that offer a combination of revenue and yield protection, including Crop Revenue Coverage (CRC), Revenue Assurance (RA), Income Protection (IP), at varying levels of coverage for the insured crop. It is also important that farmers do not overlook Catastrophic (CAT) coverage, which, while only offering partial protection against significant crop failure, is essentially free.

Once the appropriate coverage is selected, there are several steps that an insured can take to reduce potential disputes and maximize recovery in the event of a loss. First, farmers must be mindful of several important deadlines, including:

• the deadline for applying for coverage
• the final planting date
• the acreage reporting date, and
• the deadline for filing notice of crop damage. 

In addition, the RMA reports several common mistakes that can lead to a reduction or elimination of coverage, including underreporting or overreporting planted acreage, failing to report all farm serial numbers planted to the insured crop, failing to report the production of all farm serial numbers, failing to elect "new producer" status, harvesting the crop in a manner other than insured (i.e., harvesting corn as silage when it is insured as grain), and destroying insured crop without the insurance company's approval. 

Finally, perhaps the most important step a farmer can take is to organize and keep complete records relating to all insured crops. Farmers have a duty under their federal crop insurance policy to keep records related to the planting, replanting, inputs, harvesting, production, and sale of the insured crop. Well-organized records can be the key to preventing or winning a crop insurance dispute. 

Record droughts in recent years, damaging frosts, and once-in-a-lifetime flooding have all highlighted the need for crop insurance as a risk management tool. At the same time, as crop insurance indemnities set new records in 2011 and 2012, crop insurance disputes also are likely to rise. For this reason, in addition to selecting the most appropriate policy, farmers must be proactive in following the policy requirements and retaining and organizing their records in order to minimize and prevent the delay or denial of coverage. And because the decision regarding what type of crop insurance policy and what level of coverage to purchase can be quite complex, it is important for farmers to consult with their insurance agent to carefully consider coverage needs.

This advisory has been prepared by Varnum LLP for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Leave a comment
Name *
Email *
Homepage
Comment

Index

 Columns Grey

Mild weather into spring?

Weather Outlook

Jeff Andresen | January 30, 2015

Jeff Andresen pngAnother impact of the recent colder-than-normal temperatures is the development of above- normal ice cover on the Great Lakes

Decisions, decisions

Market Outlook

Dr. Jim Hilker | January 30, 2015

Jim Hilker png Why am I discussing this in an outlook article? Because a big part of the decision on what (farm bill program) to choose should be based on the next five-year price forecasts, found on my website, and much of the results are based on what has happened to corn, wheat, and soybean prices the past five years.

Checking import/export projections from Brazil and Argentina

Market Outlook

Dr. Jim Hilker | January 15, 2015

Jim Hilker png Consider checking out the updated USDA/WASDE supply/demand updates for Brazil and Argentina, which were released along with the other Jan. 12 reports. While in a very real sense they are incorporated into the U.S. soybean exports and import projections, and therefore the U.S. supply/demand projections, at this critical time in the South American growing season, they should be interesting and informative on their own

January welcomes coldest temperatures of winter thus far

Weather Outlook

Jeff Andresen | January 15, 2015

Jeff Andresen pngJust before the end of the year, the deep upper-air troughing feature that had persisted just off the western coast of the U.S. during much of December shifted eastward into the western U.S., and by early January, into the central and eastern U.S. This pattern change led to the passage of several Canadian-origin air masses in early January and to some of the coldest temperatures of the winter thus far.

Obama's immigration action: What's in it for ag?

Law of the Land

Varnum LLP | January 15, 2015 

John SturgisIn late November, President Obama announced his administration's plans to utilize executive action to reform the current immigration system. The plan did not include any specific options or reforms for agricultural workers. However, many current agricultural workers without status may benefit from the expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the initiation of the Deferred Action for Parental Accountability (DAPA) program.