Search Results
Michigan Sheep Producers Association names Elaine Palm new executive director
Register now for Lansing Legislative: Advocating for Farm Bureau policy in a changing political landscape
Two Political Academy grads elected to county drain commissioner spots
Dan Vogler, District 9 Director
Alysa Sanford, Promotion and Education Representative
Mike Noll, District 6 Director
Agricultural Commodity Commissions #1
We support and will protect the Michigan Agricultural Commodities Marketing Act (PA 232 of 1965), and other authorized agricultural commodity commissions.
We support legislation setting time frames for gubernatorial action on filling vacancies when applicants have been submitted.
Michigan Farm Bureau will consider supporting commodity group proposals that align with existing policy and are beneficial to producers, including the extension of referendums up to ten years. We encourage member involvement and support of their commodity organizations.
Animal Health #5
As the world expands to international trade, the potential for transmitting communicable diseases among the agriculture community grows. The uncontrolled spread of disease, intentional or otherwise, could devastate the entire agricultural system.
We must protect livestock health in Michigan and across the United States. A healthy animal population is critical to the overall wellbeing of the agricultural economy.
We support:
- Appointing a board of animal health to coordinate activities, programs, and regulations to expedite the control and eradication of animal diseases. The board should consist of livestock producers and industry representatives, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD), Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, Michigan State University (MSU) College of Veterinary Medicine and USDA.
- MDARD basing new regulations or restrictions for livestock exhibition on veterinary and animal science.
- Changing the Animals Running At Large Act to define livestock the same as the Animal Industry Act does.
- State funding for the MSU Veterinary Diagnostic Lab (VDL) to meet the needs of Michigan’s animal population.
- Indemnification for livestock depopulated due to disease or when marketing channels are limited or eliminated by the government.
- Changes to Michigan’s Veterinary Law that expand the services/procedures that veterinary technicians or designated staff with advanced training can perform that help address the rural vet/animal care shortage in Michigan.
- Requiring continuing education to maintain a Michigan veterinary license.
- Amending Michigan’s Veterinary Law to clarify that artificial insemination of livestock and embryo transplant procedures do not have to be performed by a licensed veterinarian.
- MSU researching health-related issues impacting Michigan’s livestock industry, including potentially toxic weeds and feedstuffs.
- Requiring livestock operation visitors to have permission and conduct proper contamination protections, including clothing and disinfectants, to protect and enhance biosecurity on-site.
- Legislative, regulatory and/or management changes that empower the State Veterinarian to collaborate with appropriate authorities to develop a mass carcass disposal plan.
- A statewide ban on the sale and use of sky (“Chinese”) lanterns and similar unmanned devices involving open flame that may leave their premises of origin because of the danger of damaging livestock, feed and feed harvesting equipment.
- Research on the potential for chronic wasting disease prions to infect livestock feed and other plant materials.
- Encouraging Michigan Farm Bureau, MSU, MDARD and USDA to:
- Provide sufficient funding and programs for animal health education, disease monitoring, border inspections and disease eradication that protect the livestock industry and ensure market access.
- Increase efforts to develop a genetic or live animal diagnostic test for Scrapie and Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE).
- Continue working cooperatively to support the VDL, and minimize its diagnostic fees.
- Annual review of the Reportable Disease List in collaboration with industry, MDARD and MDNR to remove inappropriately listed diseases.
- Livestock producers considering rabies vaccination for all pets, and to learn about the disease.
- The development and availability of bait vaccines.
Bovine
- An aggressive cost-effective Johne’s detection and control program, and the ready availability of the Johne’s vaccine to dairy farmers.
Swine
- MDARD providing adequate staffing to:
- Ensure proper monitoring of Michigan’s swine herd to maintain our achieved pseudorabies status.
- Support the development and adoption of the U.S. Swine Health Improvement Plan (SHIP) for Michigan’s swine industry.
Equine
- Requiring equine owners to consult with a veterinarian and vaccinate horses, ponies and mules against infectious and contagious diseases.
- All fairs, racing events, sale barns, riding stables and other venues where equine may comingle require annual Equine Infectious Anemia (EIA)/Coggins tests for every animal, and mandate those papers be inspected before allowing entry.
- MDARD working with animal health officials in other states to develop standardized EIA/Coggins testing guidelines and uniform testing and movement procedures.
- Eliminating EIA/Coggins test requirements for horses going to slaughter.
Animal Identification and Interstate Movement
- Swift implementation of a mandatory identification system for Michigan’s livestock and encourage the continued utilization of producer input into its development, implementation, and cost-share where feasible. Producer information shall remain proprietary, not for public use or subject to Freedom of Information Act or any requests.
- Slaughter facilities upgrading their technology to provide timely and accurate information on individual cattle.
- Rules requiring that all cattle and privately-owned Cervidae be electronically identified before leaving the farm.
- Violation penalties should be strengthened and enforced by law. In the event an animal loses its tag en route to an auction facility, they should be retagged upon arrival before being allowed to enter.
- Electronic reading and recording of all cattle exhibited in Michigan. Records should be sent to MDARD.
- MDNR, MDARD, USDA, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service working cooperatively to develop regulations to control disease spread including, but not be limited to a system for monitoring live and dead domestic and game animals coming into Michigan.
We oppose importing livestock that does not:
- Meet import testing requirements deemed appropriate by the director of MDARD,
- Have appropriate quarantine protocols in place,
- Have an animal identification system for tracking livestock movement to prevent disease spread.
Feed Additives and Medication
We recognize the need for medication and other additives in livestock feeds. The availability of livestock antibiotics is critical. Limiting or eliminating livestock antibiotic use will negatively impact the industry, both economically and with respect to animal health. Antibiotic use is approved by the Food and Drug Administration only after scientific review and testing. Animal agriculture relies on veterinarians to assist with and oversee animal health. We define veterinarian oversight as a working relationship with a licensed veterinarian.
We support:
- The existing approval process for antibiotic use in farm animals.
- Veterinarian oversight of antibiotic use rather than limiting or eliminating these critical animal health and food safety protection tools.
- Careful use and withdrawal restrictions of feed additives.
- The use of rendered animal protein as additives to swine and poultry rations.
- Strict safeguards to prevent cross-contamination of ruminant feeds with ruminant by-products formulating feed additives.
We oppose:
- Banning feed additives without scientific evidence that they threaten animal and human health.
- Restrictions limiting or eliminating marketing opportunities for the livestock, dairy, equine, poultry and aquaculture industries and their products without sound scientific justification.
- State agency farm inspections without notification to and awareness of the farm owner/operation.
- Mandatory rabies vaccination for farm cats.
Animal Care #4
Livestock production has changed significantly over time. No one has greater concern for the care and welfare of farm animals than the farmers who raise them.
We urge members to respond knowledgeably to misleading information on animal care. We urge members to understand the difference between organizations supporting sound science and animal care versus those promoting animal rights and attempting to eliminate or greatly restrict livestock production. Members should continue to tell the success story of modern animal agriculture wherever the opportunity is available. Numerous laws exist to safeguard the proper care of livestock and, if properly enforced, provide the protection livestock requires.
Michigan’s livestock and dairy industry is integral to our agricultural economy and needs access to private property rights and privacy laws. Laws appearing to limit free speech or give the perception that agriculture has something to hide may not be the appropriate way to address certain issues impacting the industry. We strongly support transparency by all involved.
People who witness animal care practices not in compliance with the Care of Farm Animals Generally Accepted Agricultural and Management Practices (GAAMPs), should report those findings in a timely manner to the appropriate authorities so proper action may be taken. People who hold and release videos in a manner for personal benefit or to promote a group and their cause should be swiftly prosecuted and appropriately fined and sentenced.
We support:
- An animal health and care board to be convened to coordinate activities to enhance and protect the state's livestock industry. The board should be comprised of farmers and industry representatives as voting members; who are nominated by officially recognized livestock and agriculture industry commodity groups; and then appointed by the Governor. Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) and Michigan State University (MSU) officials should serve in an advisory capacity. The establishment of this board should include a state budget appropriation. This new board process should be concluded by December 31, 2025.
- Strong penalties for those persons criminally convicted of animal cruelty or abuse.
- The rights of individual commodity groups to develop their own production standards.
- The involvement of livestock industry in the development of animal care guidelines if required by food industry officials to market products.
- Participation by livestock and dairy producers in industry-developed, species-specific animal welfare programs.
- Coordination with animal industry and related groups on animal care and housing related issues.
- Farmers educating and having guidelines for employees on proper animal care and monitoring their employees.
- Legislation or rules protecting the rights of farmers/owners to allow the continued utilization of modern livestock production practices, including current euthanization methods.
- 4-H and youth livestock exhibitor education.
- Michigan Farm Bureau working with MSU and MDARD to provide proper education to law enforcement, county officials and animal control officers about laws to regulate animal care and livestock production practices in Michigan.
- MFB and county Farm Bureaus being proactive in educating and training the state and local animal control authorities, local humane societies, local law enforcement, and news media about current animal care and production practices, to build a partnership between Farm Bureau and local animal care organizations.
- Emergency Response to Accidents Involving Livestock (ERAIL) programs and livestock handling training for a select number of emergency response professionals in Michigan counties, based on the county’s potential exposure to livestock emergencies.
- County Farm Bureaus consider cancelling the membership of an individual criminally convicted of animal cruelty or abuse.
- Land grant colleges and USDA continuing to research and develop programs which will realistically and economically enable farmers to continue to enhance the care and management of livestock.
- Legislation making it a felony to destroy or release animals lawfully confined for science, research and production, and strong punishment and required restitution for losses or damages.
- MDARD taking the lead role in the development of Michigan animal health emergency management guidelines in collaboration with the Animal Industry Division (AID) of MDARD, the State Veterinarian, MFB and agricultural groups.
- Amendments to the Dog Law to more clearly define a “farm dog.” The utilization of dogs on farm operations is a normal part of an agricultural enterprise.
- A sensible approach to the substantiation of animal cruelty or abuse accusations including:
- Requiring animal control officers receive training on appropriate animal care and normal agricultural practices as it relates to livestock and farm animals.
- The AID of MDARD (specifically the State Veterinarian) as the authority relating to farm animals, livestock, and relative care, not local animal control.
- Governing municipalities be held financially and civilly liable for inaccurate and unjustified actions of those officers and departments.
- Requiring reported abuse cases to follow uniform administrative procedures to confirm cruelty or abuse before any legal action is taken.
- Contacting the local law enforcement agency or animal control authority.
- Local law enforcement agencies obtaining the opinion of two unbiased local livestock professionals and a large animal veterinarian.
- Costs associated with the resulting investigation be paid for by the accuser if no abuse is found.
- Cruelty or abuse cases of farm livestock be handled through MDARD.
We oppose:
- The concept of animal rights and the expenditure of public funds to promote the concept of animal rights.
- Any attempt to grant legal standing to any animals.
- Regulatory and legislative actions restricting the farmer's/owner’s ability to produce at an economically feasible level.
- The utilization of ballot initiatives to control modern livestock production and management practices.
We support Michigan Care of Farm Animals GAAMPs through the following:
- Utilization of the Michigan Care of Farm Animals GAAMPs as the standard for animal welfare.
- Producer representation on the Michigan Care of Farm Animals GAAMPs Committee.
- Proper animal care and encourage livestock farmers to be in compliance with the Right to Farm Act and GAAMPs.
- Mandatory education for convicted cruelty offenders to help them understand proper animal care including the Care of Farm Animals GAAMPs.